Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:57
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
A Common Stimulant Could Hold the Key to Preventing Sudden Infant Death Syndrome - SciTechDaily
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Is it possible for the U.S. government to get rid of the constitution for national safety?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What is the rudest/meanest thing a family member has said to you?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
US measles total nears 1,100 cases as Colorado reports airline cluster - CIDRAP
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Reality TV star cited in Las Vegas for battery after knocking man out - AL.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
5 food combinations that naturally boost gut health - Times of India
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
United States roster at 2026 Olympics will differ from 4 Nations Face-Off, GM says - NHL.com